RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Fwd: ANARTS F6IRF SOST HP

To: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Fwd: ANARTS F6IRF SOST HP
From: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Reply-to: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 11:14:05 -0500
List-post: <mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
On 6/13/05, Jerry Flanders <jeflanders@comcast.net> wrote:

> I agree completely that there should not be rules to try to restrict SO2R.
> The precedents for allowing new innovations were set years ago when we
> didn't discriminate against Yagis/Rhombics/Towers, etc. (This is a "wire
> dipole in trees" guy writing these words).

I think I see where you're coming from, but if SO2R stations aren't in
a separate category, then why have Multi-Ops in a separate category?

-- 
Peter Laws | N5UWY/9 | plaws0 gmail
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>