To: | rtty@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [RTTY] ARRL Bandwidth Proposal - FCC Invites Comments |
From: | Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com> |
Date: | Fri, 13 Jan 2006 17:37:25 -0800 |
List-post: | <mailto:rtty@contesting.com> |
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: > >the lack of a requirement that all digital protocols be > >published and freely available in working form to enable > >monitoring and "self-policing" ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ What does "freely available in working form" mean, exactly? Free, or just freely available for a price? Working form? Does that mean software with no betas? Final release only? Let's be more specific, guys. This is how bad law gets made. Bill, W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty |
Previous by Date: | Re: [RTTY] ARRL Bandwidth Proposal - FCC Invites Comments, Bill Coleman |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [RTTY] RTTY Best Practices, Bill Coleman |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [RTTY] ARRL Bandwidth Proposal - FCC Invites Comments, Bill Coleman |
Next by Thread: | Re: [RTTY] ARRL Bandwidth Proposal - FCC Invites Comments, Joe Subich, W4TV |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |