RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] CQ-Contest SO2R

To: Jay <ws7i@ewarg.org>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] CQ-Contest SO2R
From: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 08:11:40 -0700
List-post: <mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
ORIGINAL MESSAGE:

On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 08:06:25 -0700, Jay <ws7i@ewarg.org> wrote:

>I will add one point. There is no way to ever
>equalize a radio contest.  If we had
>SO1R then we would have to have SOnoYagi, SO_50_foot lot, SO_QRP. and so
>forth and so on.

------------ REPLY FOLLOWS ------------

True, radio contesting can never be made perfectly equal. Does that
mean we should not try? Should there be no HP/LP class? No Multi-op
class? No Multi-transmitter class? 

The history of contesting has always been that when a particular type
of operating has given a significant advantage like those above, a new
class was created. SO2R is such an advantage and deserves its own
class.

Bill W6WRT
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>