RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

[RTTY] A45XR

To: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: [RTTY] A45XR
From: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 10:35:15 -0700
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
A45XR was on 10m this am.  Weak but I worked him for a new one on 10m 
and to do it on RTTY is great!  I have worked him on other bands on RTTY 
but to do it on 10 was fun!

Mike W0MU

W0MU-1 CC Cluster w0mu.net


On 12/7/2011 4:55 PM, Gary AL9A wrote:
> Gee, I guess I'd better reconsider running as a High Power station (1500W)
> in the upcoming ARRL 10M Contest.  I'd hate to become "...a lower class
> contester" because I choose to operate within the rules as specified by the
> contest sponsor!
>
> 73,
> Gary AL9A
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jim W7RY"<jimw7ry@gmail.com>
> To: "W0MU Mike Fatchett"<w0mu@w0mu.com>;<rtty@contesting.com>
> Sent: December 07, 2011 9:47 AM
> Subject: Re: [RTTY] 10m RTTY power levels
>
>
>> Because it was taken (by me, and it sounds like others) if you run high
>> power in a contest, and or even think of running high power on 10 meters,
>> your are a lower class contester.
>>
>>
>> That's why!
>>
>> 73
>> Jim W7RY
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> From: "W0MU Mike Fatchett"<w0mu@w0mu.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 10:25 AM
>> To:<rtty@contesting.com>
>> Subject: Re: [RTTY] 10m RTTY power levels
>>
>>> I don't understand why the negative comments either.  If I am *not*
>>> going to submit a score then I can operate within the rules for my
>>> license.
>>>
>>> We have had great fun in Field Day running 1A  err  One Alpha...Alpha
>>> amplifier that is....and we have huge pileups.  We don't seem to get any
>>> complaints from all those that called.  Everyone on both sides seemed to
>>> be having fun so what is the issue?
>>>
>>> Contesting and Ham Radio is supposed to be fun.
>>>
>>> Mike W0MU
>>>
>>> W0MU-1 CC Cluster w0mu.net
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/7/2011 11:21 AM, Phil Cooper wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I wasn't having a go at anyone with my comments, although I now see that
>>>> it
>>>> may have appeared this way.
>>>>
>>>> I am sure there are some that didn't read the rules, or planned to send
>>>> in a
>>>> checklog anyway, and kudos to them for operating this way.
>>>>
>>>> I did wonder if I had mis-read the rules in some way, as that wouldn't
>>>> be
>>>> unknown either. I did re-check just to see if multi-op stations were
>>>> allowed
>>>> high power, as that can be the case in some contests.
>>>>
>>>> I also wanted to make sure that anyone who submitted a 3830 score under
>>>> HP,
>>>> knew that this was probably in their Cabrillo file too, and to check!
>>>>
>>>> Whichever way you look at it, this was a great contest, and it is good
>>>> to
>>>> see 10m alive now.
>>>> There were some nice DX stations active, and my contact with VP2MWG has
>>>> already been confirmed on LoTW.
>>>>
>>>> 73 all
>>>>
>>>> Phil GU0SUP
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
>>>> Virus Database (VPS): 111207-0, 07/12/2011
>>>> Tested on: 07/12/2011 18:21:14
>>>> avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2011 AVAST Software.
>>>> http://www.avast.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> RTTY mailing list
>>>> RTTY@contesting.com
>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> RTTY mailing list
>>> RTTY@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>> _______________________________________________
>> RTTY mailing list
>> RTTY@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>