RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] The Case for QYF (was We Need a New Strategy)

To: RTTYReflector <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] The Case for QYF (was We Need a New Strategy)
From: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 12:28:36 -0700
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
On May 13, 2012, at 12:03 PM, Bill Turner wrote:

> Continuing to use the conventional split type of operation is not working. 
> The jammers and Kops are getting worse and worse. Recently the jammers have 
> been sending apparently real call signs on the DX frequency in order to 
> entice the Kilocycle Kops to send UP UP UP and other vile comments. Their 
> strategy is working perfectly. It's become an unholy mess.

For something like 17m, one way is to have the DX transmit outside the legal 
USA portion for digital modes.  It might deter some of the ejets.

I hear JA (and one KH6/K9FD typing really slowly -- probably one of these K3 
paddle guys) calling on 17m but don't hear the NA NA person you guys talk 
about.  No propagation to him or to the 7O :-).

Surely someone must live close enough to some of the frequency cops to know who 
they are?

73
Chen, W7AY

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>