RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] The Case for QYF (was We Need a New Strategy)

To: RTTYReflector <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] The Case for QYF (was We Need a New Strategy)
From: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 16:11:37 -0700
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
On May 13, 2012, at 3:42 PM, Bill Turner wrote:

> These jammers - the hardcore ones - basically are sociopaths. Barring them 
> from DXCC would have no effect. They get their kicks from disrupting everyone 
> else. They are similar to contest cheaters. They don't want to win, they want 
> to prevent you from winning. Sick but true. 

If that is true, the scheme of the DX coming to your frequency will not work 
either.

A sociopath would just go up the band giving a bogus 599 to every station that 
he hears.  

RTTY is especially easy to fake, since it neither involves a "fist" nor a voice 
-- just make up a macro that gives an identical exchange as the DX.  The only 
way to know is to measure the precise baud rate and the duration the RTTY 
signal stays on Mark at the start and end of transmission.  And those 
parameters can also be easily faked by someone who knows what he is doing.  

On top of that, a sociopath with a skimmer can easily find where the DX is 
answering and go QRM that frequency (even with automated software).  

The sociopaths who I have met are actually quite smart.  Perhaps ham sociopaths 
are not as bright; I don't know.

73
Chen, W7AY

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>