Surely you don't log a QSO that you don't have a report for do you Bill?
Read a little closer. I said I didn't get their report, and because of
that, caused by arrogant behavior they are not logged. I log a lot of jerks
in the average contest with 1000 plus QSO's, that just the law of averages,
but I am not going to guess at a report and log it, just to make work for
the log checkers,
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 8:22 AM, BILL ENGLISH <bill@k4fx.net> wrote:
> Surely you don't log a QSO that you don't have a report for do you Bill?
> Read a little closer. I said I didn't get their report, and because of
> that, caused by arrogant behavior they are not logged. I log a lot of jerks
> in the average contest, but I am not going to guess at a report and log it,
> just to make work for the log checkers,
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 7:00 AM, Bill Turner <dezrat1242@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
>> On Fri, 8 Feb 2013 01:50:51 -0500, K4FX wrote:
>>
>> >That is one of my pet peeves, when people assume they have a band
>> >commanding signal. Then you don't get their report, you sent them a
>> report
>> >and they send 73 GL and QSY. I have not logged many QSOs because of this
>> >arrogant behavior.
>>
>> REPLY:
>> I agree these guys should not do it this way, but if handled right it's
>> not
>> a problem. For example, I never send my report until I have theirs. If I
>> don't get theirs the first time I just send AGN AGN until I get it. Only
>> then do I send my report. Works for me.
>>
>> I don't recall ever not logging a Q because of their behavior.
>>
>> Bill, W6WRT
>> _______________________________________________
>> RTTY mailing list
>> RTTY@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|