IMHO.... SOmR operators are like "olympians".. really amazing stuff. I'm
content with my single radio/amp setup, and do enjoy some really good runs on
occasion.
Maybe someday contest sponsors will consider an olympian class, for those
highly proficient operators/stations that knock the scores out of the park with
their amazing skill sets.
I once heard an extremely successful (RTTY) op comment that exploitation of
contest rules is in the spirt of competition. I generally agree with that
concept... however, as the exploitation of rules becomes more common, as in the
case of SOmR, then my suggestion is to create another submittal class, and
segment the competitors on that basis.
My two cents... and always look forward to having air time during RTTY contests!
Vy 73
Greg N6CK
--- On Sat, 2/16/13, Jay WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com> wrote:
From: Jay WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>
Subject: [RTTY] Debate
To: rtty@contesting.com
Date: Saturday, February 16, 2013, 6:29 AM
Nah, let's debate again its been a while. Using your logic a Multi
operator is a Multi yet there are M/S, M2, MM we should just have one
....right ?
On 2/15/2013 7:34 PM, John Merrill wrote:
> I hope we are not going to get into the debate again that SO2R should be a
> different category :-). A single op is a single op no matter how many radios
> or antennas or amps he /she has....right??
>
>
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|