I don't understand this one:
* Shouldn’t 2.8 kilohertz bandwidth data emissions be restricted to the
band segments where phone and image communications are permitted?-
While some commenters have argued for that, it is far beyond the scope of the
ARRL petition. It would require a complete reordering of the regulatory scheme
for the HF bands which would be controversial, to say the least.
I don't understand the part about having to completely reorder the regulatory
scheme. That sounds like a bunch of malarkey.
And are they trying to say the current proposal is not already controversial
enough?
Don AA5AU
>________________________________
> From: Ron Kolarik <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
>To: RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
>Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 1:02 AM
>Subject: [RTTY] RM-11708 FAQ posted
>
>
>The ARRL FAQ is up
>http://www.arrl.org/rm-11708-faq
>I haven't had time to go through it yet.
>
>Ron
>K0IDT
>_______________________________________________
>RTTY mailing list
>RTTY@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|