RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 FAQ posted

To: "Mark" <n2qt@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 FAQ posted
From: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 00:53:25 -0600
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Yup, trust us. This is what one question/answer should look like

Q. Did ARRL evaluate the potential for interference to RTTY, CW and narrow bandwidth data modes that could result from an increase in wider-bandwidth data stations? A. Yes. we asked K5RAV and the rest of the ad hoc digital committee and they thought it was okey dokey fine. We'll put a bandplan in after we get enough complaints, we want a bandplan not regulation, it's easier to ignore a bandplan if no one can identify a station or content and
no pesky regulations that carry the weight of law.

The rest isn't much better and the cynic in me says I should provide new answers
to all the questions and send them to Sumner but he has a history of ignoring 
input.

Ron K0IDT



----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark" <n2qt@yahoo.com>
To: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Cc: "RTTY" <rtty@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 10:53 AM
Subject: Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 FAQ posted


Basically, a "trust us". And if it goes all wrong, well something can be done 
eventually...

Mark. N2QT


_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>