Yup, trust us. This is what one question/answer should look like
Q. Did ARRL evaluate the potential for interference to RTTY, CW and narrow bandwidth data
modes that could result from an increase in wider-bandwidth data stations?
A. Yes. we asked K5RAV and the rest of the ad hoc digital committee and they thought it was
okey dokey fine. We'll put a bandplan in after we get enough complaints, we want a bandplan
not regulation, it's easier to ignore a bandplan if no one can identify a station or content and
no pesky regulations that carry the weight of law.
The rest isn't much better and the cynic in me says I should provide new answers
to all the questions and send them to Sumner but he has a history of ignoring
input.
Ron
K0IDT
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark" <n2qt@yahoo.com>
To: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Cc: "RTTY" <rtty@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 10:53 AM
Subject: Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 FAQ posted
Basically, a "trust us". And if it goes all wrong, well something can be done
eventually...
Mark. N2QT
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|