You guys going to Dayton may want to ask the ARRL about enforcement
face to face, wear your buttons. ARRL has adopted Winlink as part of their
emcomm program, they have also asked the FCC for more visible and
timely enforcement in the ham bands......I must be missing something there.
Ron
K0IDT
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
To: <rtty@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2014 7:41 PM
Subject: Re: [RTTY] New Winlink usage
> Of course, if you heard an automated node respond to the QRMer, the
> center frequency involved and the publication of Winlink node
> frequencies whould make it a pretty short list of candidates who have
> placed too much faith in listen-before-transmit (or who have disabled
> busy detection).
Why is winlink.org *not* enforcing the rules on its members and
participants? The most likely explanation, since they recommend that
busy channel detection be disabled, is that they feel their operations
are "above the law". That is, by definition, intentional which should
be met by a substantial monetary forfeiture and license suspensions.
ARRL should be pressuring the FCC to institute enforcement action
against winlink.org and its system operators as vigorously as it has
pursued action against others (like K1MAN) evidencing contempt for the
rules.
73,
... Joe, W4TV
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|