In no way is this "amusing". It is a portent of of what awaits us all
should RM-11708 be enacted as is.
Dick, I think you should send a copy of your email to ARRL and ask why they
interfered with one of their own W1AW portable stations? Also ask what are
they going to do to insure this doesn't happen again to any unfortunate soul
who happens to be operating on "their" frequency when its time to transmit a
ARRL bulletin?
73,
Gary AL9A
-----Original Message-----
From: David Tanks via RTTY
Sent: June 02, 2014 2:35 PM
To: Dick Kriss ; RTTY Reflector
Subject: Re: [RTTY] QRM to W1AW/0 (MO) RTTY
This is amusing. The ARRL is touting RM 11708 as being helpful, while at the
same time QRMing an on-going operation on a frequency without checking to
see if it is busy! The ARRL does not have a right to a frequency if it is
occupied already. They are supposed to move to prevent QRM, correct?
73, David AD4TJ
________________________________
From: Dick Kriss <aa5vu@att.net>
To: RTTY Reflector <rtty@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, June 2, 2014 6:29 PM
Subject: [RTTY] QRM to W1AW/0 (MO) RTTY
I was trying to work W1AW/0 (MO) on RTTY at 18.100 and W1AW home bulletin
station came on like a PACTOR robot and wiped out any chance of working the
W1AW/O Centennial station.
Future W1AW/P RTTY operations should avoid W1AW broadcast frequencies.
Dick AA5VU
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|