Re: [RTTY] RM-11708

[Michael Adams <mda@n1en.org>]

I'm not the Mike to whom the question was asked, but I would point out that I'm 
pretty sure this particular equine carcass was likely adequately flogged as 
part of the K1MAN case.

Looking through the documents for that case should reveal that the FCC is aware 
and tolerant of W1AW's practices.  I wouldn't be too surprised to see that if 
someone were to press too hard on the bulletins' potentially being willful 
interference, the FCC would most likely respond by tweaking the rules in such a 
way as to make another exception that only W1AW/the ARRL could meet.

Pick your battles.  Beating your fists pointlessly on the adamantium wall is a 
good way to bruise one's fists, elevate one's blood pressure, and to make one's 
self look foolish.

-- 
Michael Adams | N1EN | mda@n1en.org

W0MU wrote:
> 
> You seem like a smart guy Mike.  Why are you trying to cover for the ARRL and
> their bad behavior.  The rules say to listen first and not use a frequency 
> already
> in use.  Period.  How many times does the ARRL
> trounce on other users.   I have not clue.  I am not set up to listen on
> 6 bands from multiple locations across the map.  There is an entity that can 
> do
> this.
> 
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty