Hello,
Could we change the message subject to something like "Argument about
W1AW", so I can build a filter to remove them all as they arrive
please?... This has zero to do with RM-11708, which the subject
suggests.
--
Thanks and 73's,
For equipment, and software setups and reviews see:
www.nk7z.net
for MixW support see;
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/mixw/info
for Dopplergram information see:
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/dopplergram/info
for MM-SSTV see:
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/MM-SSTV/info
On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 21:50 -0600, W0MU Mike Fatchett wrote:
> Failing to listen prior to using a frequency constitutes willful
> interference.
>
> When they fire up 6 or more transmitters each and everyday at various
> times without ever listening most people would draw the conclusion that
> they are trouncing on someone.
>
> I can site two that were just recently. W1AW firing up on top of W1AW/X
> and another instance where the code practice wiped out a dx station and
> pileup. I have had a number of other people tell me that they have had
> to leave a frequency because W1AW fired up on top of them. Shall we
> post on QRZ, Eham and some other major websites and watch the replies
> come in?
>
> You seem like a smart guy Mike. Why are you trying to cover for the
> ARRL and their bad behavior. The rules say to listen first and not use
> a frequency already in use. Period. How many times does the ARRL
> trounce on other users. I have not clue. I am not set up to listen on
> 6 bands from multiple locations across the map. There is an entity that
> can do this.
>
> I would prefer to see the ARRL and board change their ways, fix the
> problems or the technology and act like good citizens on the bands.
> Instead they act like they own their published frequencies and use a
> rule that allows them to pay someone as an excuse to cause willful
> interference. If you want to go down the path of embarrassing the ARRL
> with FCC intervention, I am certain that there are plenty of people
> willing to help you to that goal.
>
> Mike W0MU
>
> On 6/9/2014 7:32 PM, Mike Tessmer wrote:
> > from [W0MU Mike Fatchett]
> >
> >> The ARRL and W1AW have been willfully interfering with just users of
> >> spectrum for years.
> >> That is something to be proud of. So much for courtesy. It is expected by
> >> the ARRL/W1AW
> >> but never given.
> >> The ARRL does not care about deliberate interference. They do it on a
> >> daily basis with
> >> the bulletins and code practice sessions...
> >
> > Mike
> >
> > Please cite specific examples of this deliberate interference - more than
> > one, please,
> > since you have stated that this has been going on daily, for years. Please
> > include the parties
> > affected, the dates, times, frequencies, etc. I'm not naïve - I'm sure
> > someone, somewhere,
> > at some time has had a QSO interrupted by the regular bulletin
> > transmissions. But "deliberate"
> > implies intent. Can you prove that that W1AW was intent on interrupting an
> > ongoing QSO?
> >
> > I still have no idea what W1AW bulletin transmissions have to do with
> > RM-11708.
> >
> >
> > 73, Mike K9NW
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > RTTY mailing list
> > RTTY@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|