RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Point-and-click vs typing

To: <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Point-and-click vs typing
From: "Don Hill AA5AU" <aa5au@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2014 22:59:14 -0500
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Ditto... Ed has it right and his scores prove it.

Switching the same keyboard and/or mouse between two PCs is a huge waste of 
time and effort. Running SO2R with separate keyboards is
actually ergonomic since you can relax your hands at the base of each keyboard 
when no action is required at a particular time. It's
this small amount of "rest" that is actually particularly important, especially 
when you start to age! A continuous effort of
switching between PCs or in the case of a single PC, switching the focus 
between two radios is energy consuming and therefore
counter-productive to efficient SO2R or SO3R operation.

73, Don AA5AU

-----Original Message-----
From: RTTY [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Ed Muns
Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2014 10:48 PM
To: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Point-and-click vs typing

Multiplicity and other KVM switches are inadequate for one-PC/radio contesting. 
 The context switching overhead kills the ability to
run multiple radios effectively, efficiently and fast in high-rate contesting.
Yes, KVMs "work", but that's not nearly good enough for this application.

In SO2R RTTY contesting, for example, I have one hand on the keyboard 
associated with each radio.  I can time and synchronize runs
on each radio with a single key press.  There is no time available to also be 
doing context switching for every key press, to move
the UI from one PC to another.  That effectively doubles the amount of key 
presses or actions needed to accomplish the same results.
It is an unnecessary additional action that has to be made thousands of times 
during a weekend's contest.
Furthermore, it is far too easy to inadvertently wind up on the wrong PC.
With distinct, separate keyboards/trackballs/LCDs, that seldom, if ever, 
happens.

If I wanted to run SO2R from a single UI (keyboard/mouse/monitor), I'd simply 
use the native SO2R capability built into the contest
logging software.

KVM make sense when the amount of typing or key presses on each PC is far 
greater than the key presses, or other action, to switch
between PCs.  That is not the case in radio sport. 

Ed W0YK

------------------------------------------------------

Michael N1EN wrote:

If you're using one-computer-per-radio and are using Windows, take a look at 
Multiplicity (http://edgerunner.com/multiplicity)

Multiplicity is a virtual KVM switch.  You run it on two or more computers, and 
it allows you to take mouse and keyboard input from
one computer to drive multiple computers connected via IP.  Properly set up, 
the effect is similar to having multiple monitors on
your desk.

I've been using it for years.  It isn't necessarily intuitive to set up, and I 
have had an occasional glitch, but it beats having
multiple keyboards and multiple mice/trackballs if you have to use multiple 
computers.

Warning: if using it for with shack computers that will be doing digital modes, 
I recommend disabling audio-sharing between
computers in Multiplicity.  

There is (was?) also a free, multi-platform program called Synergy that claims 
to do much the same thing.  I tried it several years
ago; at that time it had issues, but if it's still around and actively 
maintained, I suspect it has improved.

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2014.0.4765 / Virus Database: 4037/8323 - Release Date: 10/04/14

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>