> Like it or not, the bands are shared usually based on bandwidth of the
> signal (depending on your country).
While that is true, IARU recognize the "center of activity" concept.
The JT65/JT9 "center of activity" is x.076-x.080 *and that does not*
*change* just because there is a RTTY contest - any more than the
PACTOR autobots leave 14.095-14.0995/14.1005-14.115 and PSK31/63
abandons xx.070-xx.074 for the duration of the contest.
RTTY contesters need to learn if the dial reads less than xx.0805 they
are causing *intentional QRM* to other modes and find another frequency
or band. I was frankly disgusted by the number of *big guns* who should
know better coming up on top of existing TJT9 and JT65 QSOs all weekend.
It is time that RTTY contest sponsors make a strong effort to educate
their participants about other digital activity below xx.080 (between
xx.070 and xx.080) particularly on 20 and 15 meters.
73,
... Joe, W4TV
On 2015-01-05 9:34 AM, Michael Walker wrote:
Like it or not, the bands are shared usually based on bandwidth of the
signal (depending on your country). If you want channelized operation you
may have to look elsewhere--just not ham radio.
Be very happy we have this flexibility.
Mike va3mw
On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 9:04 PM, Lynn W. Taylor, WB6UUT <
KX3@coldrockshotbrooms.com> wrote:
I'm just guessing, but didn't someone on the list say there was an RTTY
contest?
Isn't it fairly common for contesters to get a bit "enthusiastic" and
overlook things, especially when the op is a contester, and not necessarily
on RTTY at any other time?
On 1/3/2015 5:39 PM, Harry Yingst via Elecraft wrote:
What up with all the Lids running JT-65 right over the top of existing
JT65 QSO's
Haven't they ever head of Listen before you transmit?
Better Yet have they heard of a Band Plan?
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|