RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] ARRL BOD minutes published

To: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] ARRL BOD minutes published
From: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 15:41:01 -0500
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>

> How would you allow for pirates?  I remember one contest a few years
> ago when a pirate, using a well known callsign, caused havoc for hours
> on end.

I'm sure that if one is properly logging his/her operations- or was
otherwise able to prove the operations were not from his/her station -
that it would be no problem.

While logging is not a requirement, even the Commission indicates that
it is good practice.

73,

  ... Joe, W4TV


On 2015-01-30 1:54 PM, Bill Turner wrote:
------------ ORIGINAL MESSAGE ------------(may be snipped)

On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 10:46:12 -0500, W4TV wrote:

Perhaps ARRL needs to beef up the OO program and start issuing "cards"
again for bad operating.

REPLY:

How would you allow for pirates?  I remember one contest a few years
ago when a pirate, using a well known callsign, caused havoc for hours
on end.

Bill W6WRT
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>