Sorry forgot to add this
"And, for what it's worth, where else are hams using peer to peer digital (Pactor 3
and Winmor 1600) supposed to operate?"
How much p2p P3 or Winmor 1600 is actually used for conversation? It's file
transfer and email, no one I know types at those speeds.
I see P3 mailboxes operating outside the auto sub band and the usual excuse is
remote base or prove it's a mailbox. Please
don't tell me to file a complaint, it's useless when no one listens or takes
any action. I have seen some, very little, P1 conversations
recently but it's horribly slow watching all the ARQ on marginal bands.
Ron K0IDT
On 8/16/2016 3:45 PM, Matthew Pitts via RTTY wrote:
Ron,
Ted has mentioned wide bandwidth voice modes, and so did you in a message to another
list, which is why I asked the question I did. The point I am trying to to make is that
these things would already be happening if folks wanted to do them in the RTTY/data
bands. The same is true if people wanted to "fill up the RTTY/Data bands with
wideband digital", as I believe he said; we wouldn't be able to use any of the
digital modes we like if there really were that many people that could afford to build a
station that they could not use for anything else. And, for what it's worth, where else
are hams using peer to peer digital (Pactor 3 and Winmor 1600) supposed to operate?
Matthew Pitts
N8OHU
On August 16, 2016 12:28:28 PM EDT, Ron Kolarik <rkolarik@neb.rr.com> wrote:
Matthew, try to stick to the subject. Stations operating under
97.221(c)
regularly blast anything in their way
and if the P3 stations would stay where they belong it would help. No
one said anything about current
stations running 6kHz wide modes.....where the hell did that come
from??
Ron K0IDT
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|