RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] FW: If you care about CW and RTTY - time is of the essence

To: Ron Kolarik <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>,rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] FW: If you care about CW and RTTY - time is of the essence
From: Matthew Pitts via RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
Reply-to: Matthew Pitts <n8ohu@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 17:18:44 -0400
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Ron,

It's also classified as Phone under current rules, irrespective of what the 
emission designators say it is. Also, to the best of my knowledge (and I say 
this because I'm in quite a few System Fusion message groups) there is 
absolutely zero interest in operating it on HF; D-STAR does show up on the HF 
bands occasionally, but for a very short time and in the Phone portion of the 
bands. 

Matthew Pitts
N8OHU 

On August 16, 2016 5:00:04 PM EDT, Ron Kolarik <rkolarik@neb.rr.com> wrote:
>Matthew, the reason you don't see wide band digi voice in the sub band 
>is simple. In the case
>of System Fusion, 12.5kHz, the baud rate is 9600 and not legal under 
>current rules but.....you
>knew that was coming, the emission designators are allowed under
>current 
>rules, F1D F7W .
>
>I really don't know what the FCC or the ARRL had in mind when they went
>
>down this dirt road.
>
>Ron K0IDT
>
>
>On 8/16/2016 3:45 PM, Matthew Pitts via RTTY wrote:
>> Ron,
>>
>> Ted has mentioned wide bandwidth voice modes, and so did you in a
>message to another list, which is why I asked the question I did. The
>point I am trying to to make is that these things would already be
>happening if folks wanted to do them in the RTTY/data bands. The same
>is true if people wanted to "fill up the RTTY/Data bands with wideband
>digital", as I believe he said; we wouldn't be able to use any of the
>digital modes we like if there really were that many people that could
>afford to build a station that they could not use for anything else.
>And, for what it's worth, where else are hams using peer to peer
>digital (Pactor 3 and Winmor 1600) supposed to operate?
>>
>> Matthew Pitts
>> N8OHU
>>
>> On August 16, 2016 12:28:28 PM EDT, Ron Kolarik <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
>wrote:
>>> Matthew, try to stick to the subject. Stations operating under
>>> 97.221(c)
>>> regularly blast anything in their way
>>> and if the P3 stations would stay where they belong it would help.
>No
>>> one said anything about current
>>> stations running 6kHz wide modes.....where the hell did that come
>>> from??
>>>
>>> Ron K0IDT
>>>
>>>
>>>

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>