| To: | RTTY Reflector <rtty@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RTTY] FW: If you care about CW and RTTY - time is of the essence |
| From: | Ron Kolarik <rkolarik@neb.rr.com> |
| Date: | Sun, 14 Aug 2016 14:59:23 -0500 |
| List-post: | <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com> |
Matthew, it's happening now with the 97.221(c) stations. What makes you
think the wide band stuff
will behave any better? The big problem is no one, not the FCC or the
ARRL, is watching or responding
to complaints. Ron K0IDT On 8/14/2016 9:34 AM, Matthew Pitts via RTTY wrote: Some major flaws that I see in his argument are: 4: As I said before, claims of a massive increase in the number of automatic stations or wide bandwidth digital voice stations swamping the RTTY/Data bands are nothing more than FUD. _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [RTTY] FW: If you care about CW and RTTY - time is of the essence, Ron Kolarik |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [RTTY] A question on the history of the major RTTY contests, Rudy Bakalov via RTTY |
| Previous by Thread: | [RTTY] FW: FW: If you care about CW and RTTY - time is of the essence, Jim McDonald |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [RTTY] FW: If you care about CW and RTTY - time is of the essence, Matthew Pitts via RTTY |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |