Re: [RTTY] FW: If you care about CW and RTTY - time is of the essence

[Ron Kolarik <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>]

Yup, and the Canadians got a bit upset over the proposed ARRL band plan 
because they use
or RTTY/Data sub band for SSB to get away from US stations. The other 
problem is that Matthew
failed to recognize the Candians have a band plan that generally follows 
Region 2.
<http://wp.rac.ca/rac-comments-on-arrl-proposed-changes-to-us-hf-band-plans/>
<http://www.rac.ca/rac-0-30-mhz-band-plan/>

Ron K0IDT

On 8/14/2016 10:00 AM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:
> On 8/14/2016 10:34 AM, Matthew Pitts via RTTY wrote:
> > Also, a 500 Hz bandwidth limit would do little to reduce
> > interferencewhen Canada has a 6 kHz bandwidth limit.
> You're so far off base that you aren't even on the ball field.
>
> US licensees: 800,000 vs. Canadian licensees <70,000.  At that
> ratio, giving each Canadian licensee 6 KHz is equivalent to
> giving each American 525 Hz.
>
> 73,
>
>    ... Joe, W4TV
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty