RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] FW: If you care about CW and RTTY - time is of the essence

To: Ron Kolarik <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>,rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] FW: If you care about CW and RTTY - time is of the essence
From: Matthew Pitts via RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
Reply-to: Matthew Pitts <n8ohu@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 06:49:13 -0400
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Ron,

How often are hams in the RTTY/data segment interfered with by 6 kHz bandwidth 
signals that originate from hams now? If the answer is they haven't been, you 
have your answer about the question. 

Matthew Pitts
N8OHU 

On August 14, 2016 3:59:23 PM EDT, Ron Kolarik <rkolarik@neb.rr.com> wrote:
>Matthew, it's happening now with the 97.221(c) stations. What makes you
>
>think the wide band stuff
>will behave any better? The big problem is no one, not the FCC or the 
>ARRL, is watching or responding
>to complaints.
>
>Ron K0IDT
>
>
>On 8/14/2016 9:34 AM, Matthew Pitts via RTTY wrote:
>> Some major flaws that I see in his argument are:
>>
>> 4: As I said before, claims of a massive increase in the number of
>automatic stations or wide bandwidth digital voice stations swamping
>the RTTY/Data bands are nothing more than FUD.
>>
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>RTTY mailing list
>RTTY@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>