The non-K-land nodes should be identifiable from the Winlink station/frequency
lists (and I believe there are some VE and XE stations in the system)
For other uses of Pactor...you'd be stuck with the usual problems of decoding
Pactor, previously discussed. RM-11708 by itself shouldn't impact those
problems in the short term; there are no constraints today on
keyboard-to-keyboard or P2P usage of the typical automated modes; there are no
frequency constraints on automated stations up to 500Hz; and if anyone is
running wideband automated stations from FCC-regulated space...well,
rule-breakers are still going to be rule-breakers.
In my mid-term scenario, there could be some additional QRM caused by VE/XE
automated stations and any non-automated users shifting away from the US
automated subbands because of potential increased usage. But I don't honestly
have a good sense of how much such activity there is currently in the US
automated subbands; I'd think that they already have plenty of incentive to be
on other frequencies, and therefore shouldn't generate incremental QRM beyond
any general overall increase in system usage.
--
Michael Adams | mda@n1en.org
-----Original Message-----
From: Ron Kolarik [mailto:rkolarik@neb.rr.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 17 August, 2016 13:07
To: Michael Adams <mda@n1en.org>; rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] FW: If you care about CW and RTTY - time is of the essence
One question for you, how do you tell if a P2-4 station(s) operating outside
the auto sub bands is P2P, from a non-domestic source or yet another illegal
mailbox? The reason you don't see a lot of the MTxx modes could be because the
masses don't see them as a useful conversational mode even though they have
advantages.
Ron K0IDT
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|