To: | <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [TenTec] Re: Ten Tec antenna tuners |
From: | n4lq@iglou.com (Steve Ellington) |
Date: | Wed, 29 Mar 2000 15:16:50 -0500 (EST) |
In reference to the TT 238 tuner. It is not a T type tuner. Rather it's an L network. It will match a much wider range of impedances than a T type tuner. Next: Putting the balun on the input side of the tuner would require a balanced tuner thus an extra coil and capacitor which would practically double the cost if the same impedance range were covered. The Johnson tuner used link coupling and had a rather narrow impedance range in comparison to the TT L network. The L network provides superior harmonic supression in comparison to the T network used by MFJ and other manufactures however, since it acts as a low pass filter, it does not attenuate broadcast band signals as well as a T network. As for saturated baluns....You usually run in that when trying to match a very low impedance. Trying to load an 80 meter dipole on 160m will make the balun heat up. Keep this in mind when designing the antenna system. The smaller TT tuners were T types but not the 238. 73 > > -- > FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm > Submissions: tentec@contesting.com > Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com > Problems: owner-tentec@contesting.com > Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm > > Steve Ellington N4LQ N4LQ@IGLOU.COM -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-tentec@contesting.com Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm |
Previous by Date: | [TenTec] Ten Tec Station, N8WNB@aol.com |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [TenTec] Re: Ten Tec antenna tuners, Steve Ellington |
Previous by Thread: | [TenTec] Re: TenTec VS Johnson., Steve Ellington |
Next by Thread: | [TenTec] Re: Ten Tec antenna tuners, Sherrill WATKINS |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |