What's wrong with the Scout? Is it drifty,
inaccurate, or does the CW thing bother you (you know,
the fact that it measures the injection freq, not the
carrier freq, of a CW signal--it winds up being
+/-700Hz)? Or the fact it only goes down to 100Hz
resolution? Just curious, I have one.
BTW, for what it's worth, at the moment, I'm content
with +/-100Hz accuracy, as I would only do voice/cw (I
don't operate much at the moment) and that's close
enough.
KB1CKT
****
Message: 14
From: "Scott Johnson" <scott@wowpage.com>
To: <TenTec@contesting.com>
Subject: RE: [TenTec] Omni VI Plus freq. readout
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 15:27:17 -0400
I have to chuckle over all this. My first radio was a
Ten-Tec Century
21,
and it didn't even HAVE a digital frequency readout.
I seem to recall
having no trouble using it, regardless.
Is this really worth bickering for days over? It's
sure affecting the
signal to noise ratio on this list.
I have two radios that have nice, accurate frequency
readouts, an
IC-756PRO
and a Jupiter. I have one that doesn't, a Scout. I
would have to
bicker
with myself, and nobody wants to listen to that. :)
Scott
--
Scott Johnson (scott@wowpage.com)
(s.johnson@klotzdigital.com)
ICQ: 30730876 ICBM: N33 45 50.6 W84 49 31.3 (+- 3dB)
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
|