| To: | <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Argonaut V ARRL Review 3rd and 2nd IPs ? |
| From: | "Stuart Rohre" <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu> |
| Reply-to: | tentec@contesting.com |
| Date: | Tue, 4 Mar 2003 13:21:34 -0600 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
They actually did get some donations of equipment recently! But, perhaps the ability to express the measurements in means available in well equipped home labs is a major consideration? Interesting thoughts. The testing is better than that of some companies; especially when it comes to near signals- sensitivity to overloading. 73, Stuart K5KVH |
| Previous by Date: | [TenTec] digit, no body |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] may order more airpax breakers, Frank Creel |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Argonaut V ARRL Review 3rd and 2nd IPs ?, Cliff |
| Next by Thread: | [TenTec] Re: # 4 Argonaut V ARRL Review 3rd and 2nd IPs ?, Jim Reid |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |