[TenTec] Re: # 4 Argonaut V ARRL Review 3rd and 2nd IPs ?

To:	<tentec@contesting.com>
Subject:	[TenTec] Re: # 4 Argonaut V ARRL Review 3rd and 2nd IPs ?
From:	jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid)
Date:	Tue Mar 4 16:21:56 2003

 
From: "Stuart Rohre" 

> I disagree that the ARRL test method is inaccurate.  

Read Ed Hare's piece in the July/August, 2002, QEX,
pgs. 50 and 51,  along with the surrounding paper
by Doug Smith,  pgs. 46 - 52.  Many sources of
inaccuracies are discussed and admitted.

73,  Jim  KH7M

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[TenTec] Argonaut V ARRL Review 3rd and 2nd IPs ?, (continued) [TenTec] Argonaut V ARRL Review 3rd and 2nd IPs ?, Stuart Rohre [TenTec] Argonaut V ARRL Review 3rd and 2nd IPs ?, Jim Reid [TenTec] Argonaut V ARRL Review 3rd and 2nd IPs ?, KD5NWA [TenTec] Argonaut V ARRL Review 3rd and 2nd IPs ?, WILLIAM MANSEY; WA2PVK [TenTec] Argonaut V ARRL Review 3rd and 2nd IPs ?, Stuart Rohre [TenTec] Argonaut V ARRL Review 3rd and 2nd IPs ?, Cliff [TenTec] Argonaut V ARRL Review 3rd and 2nd IPs ?, Stuart Rohre [TenTec] Re: # 4 Argonaut V ARRL Review 3rd and 2nd IPs ?, Jim Reid [TenTec] Re: # 4 Argonaut V ARRL Review 3rd and 2nd IPs ?, Joe Malloy [TenTec] Re: # 4 Argonaut V ARRL Review 3rd and 2nd IPs ?, Stuart Rohre [TenTec] Re: # 4 Argonaut V ARRL Review 3rd and 2nd IPs ?, Jim Reid <= [TenTec] Re: # 4 Argonaut V ARRL Review 3rd and 2nd IPs ?, Stuart Rohre [TenTec] Re: # 4 Argonaut V ARRL Review 3rd and 2nd IPs ?, W2AGN [TenTec] Argonaut V ARRL Review 3rd and 2nd IPs ?, Jay Bromley

Previous by Date:	[TenTec] ARRL Rcvr 3rd and 2nd IPs Test Methods, Jim Reid
Next by Date:	[TenTec] may order more airpax breakers, Irvin Weinman
Previous by Thread:	[TenTec] Re: # 4 Argonaut V ARRL Review 3rd and 2nd IPs ?, Stuart Rohre
Next by Thread:	[TenTec] Re: # 4 Argonaut V ARRL Review 3rd and 2nd IPs ?, Stuart Rohre
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]