| To: | <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Re: # 4 Argonaut V ARRL Review 3rd and 2nd IPs ? |
| From: | "Stuart Rohre" <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu> |
| Reply-to: | tentec@contesting.com |
| Date: | Tue, 4 Mar 2003 18:01:09 -0600 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Well, the point I am making is they are no more inaccurate than industry and science work in general. You always admit your sources of error; that is what makes a good test method; you have analyzed your sources of error and can account for them and determine if your result is reasonable. -Stuart K5KVH |
| Previous by Date: | [TenTec] Precision in Frequency displays, Stuart Rohre |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [TenTec] Info on connecting W4PY and Logger, Keith Lodahl |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Re: # 4 Argonaut V ARRL Review 3rd and 2nd IPs ?, Jim Reid |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Re: # 4 Argonaut V ARRL Review 3rd and 2nd IPs ?, W2AGN |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |