Well, actually, on VHF and UHF FM, we've been living with channelized
operation for many years.
73,
Bob WB2VUF
Bill KB9IV wrote:
>
> Looks like 60 Meter CB to me?
>
> Bill KB9IV
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Cliff" <csegar@mindspring.com>
> To: <tentec@contesting.com>
> Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2003 8:53 PM
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] 60M
>
> > At 06:03 PM 5/15/2003 -0600, Ed, K7DXV, wrote:
> >
> > >You know that we will not be able to work mobile, and
> > >our equipment will have to be crystal controlled?
> >
> > Huh? At the 50w ERP level (referenced to a dipole driven with 50w PEP with
> > a loss-less feed line) it would seem quite reasonable that few mobile
> > antennas would come close to this power level - especially if the power
> > level on the rig is only 50w PEP. I also would say that 99.44% of the rigs
> > in use are crystal controlled. Yes, they are synthesized but that is
> > controlled by a (hopefully stable) crystal. Now I haven't read the entire
> > R&O from the web site but the excerpt posted here said nothing about fixed
> > only operation.
> > Yes, it is going to be a very unusual band. We as hams can't imagine one
> > where CW is not allowed and the CB type channelization is a really foreign
> > concept but if we calmly look at what we are getting and make good use of
> > it, we can possibly get a bigger slice of cake at the next birthday party.
> > If we do nothing but whine I doubt we will even be invited to the party
> > next year.
> >
> > 73 de KD4GT
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TenTec mailing list
> > TenTec@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|