TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: RE: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review
From: "Rick Westerman" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Reply-to: Rick@dj0ip.de, tentec@contesting.com
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 18:18:00 +0100
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Yuri, sounds like you're about to open up a "Ring of Fire" ;-)

-----Original Message-----
From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com]On Behalf Of K3BU@aol.com
Sent: Saturday, December 27, 2003 5:24 PM
To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review

In a message dated 12/27/03 9:16:14 AM Eastern Standard Time,
Kc9cdt@aol.com
writes:
Another question, with all of the reviews, WHY IS IT NONE OF THEM
COMPLAINED
ABOUT THIS?

Because they are mostly "magazine" reviews. Magazines need ads to
survive,
they are not going to bite the hand that feeds them, other thing
is the personal
(expertise, sex :-) preferences of the reviewer. Some like
blondes, some like
brunettes, some like ....

This unbiased, contester reviewer paid for his radio, and is
almost done with
first part of review, so stand by (for flame wars from TT
worshipers :-)

Yuri, K3BU.us
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>