TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: More Re: [TenTec] Orion redefines the meaning of ... AGC OFF

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: More Re: [TenTec] Orion redefines the meaning of ... AGC OFF
From: "Lynn Lamb" <w4nl@charter.net>
Reply-to: tentec@contesting.com
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2004 21:50:22 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
I'll say again, IF a person has the knowledge and wishes to use that
knowledge, learns how to operate the Orion, is not an angry person, and
truly wants to offer something to our community, then we can all benefit.
Most of the reflector comments are helpful, positive and negative.  Ten Tec
listens and acts on these comments.

This offering falls far short for some or all the reasons above!

Lynn Lamb, W4NL


----- Original Message ----- 
From: <K3BU@aol.com>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004 9:34 PM
Subject: Re: More Re: [TenTec] Orion redefines the meaning of ... AGC OFF


> In a message dated 2/7/04 6:23:57 PM Eastern Standard Time,
nq5t@comcast.net
> writes:
>
> Not sure why we keep going back to those "tests".  Even John Devoldere
> very politely did what he could to try and debunk that particular urban
> legend in his Orion review.
>
> Because we want to and because there is something to it.
> ON4UN is nice guy, I respect him, but he is not gospel. Did he tried to
> measure or replicate the tests? I remember him praising MKV (worst of
FT1k's), how
> much better it is than 1000D.  Also his remark about not being able to use
> synchro receiver on Orion, when all you have to do is offset the RIT on
one of
> them.
>
> K6SE tests are not urban legend. He is one of the top and accomplished
hams,
> he knows the stuff and if you knew more about it, you might be more
inclined
> to have closer look at the problem rather than ridiculing and singing
praises
> and hallelujahs about crap. I will repeat his test under perhaps more
> controlled situation, but so far what I have seen, I agree with Earl's
conclusions.
>
> Orion has some remarkable and advanced features, but quite a few rough
edges
> especially for the competitive hams. It was supposed to be amazing rig for
> contesters, but so far for the money it comes short on ergonomics. Cheap
IC706 or
> K2 could give it some lessons in that directions.
>
> Your posts smell by the blind devotion to Ten-Tec things, even if they do
not
> deserve it. Get real! It doesn't help anybody to keep proclaiming that
> emperor has nice clothes.
>
> 73 Yuri, K3BU
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>