Well, the ole OMNI C was never easy on the eARS. remember the gun shot
effect?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Weber" <kd9bo@mac.com>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2004 22:07
Subject: [TenTec] Old Vs. New Technology
> The recent discussion about the old Omni's started me thinking.
> (doesn't happen all that much, but that's a whole 'nother subject)
>
> How does an Omni B or C stack up against the present day
> almost-but-not-quite-top-of-the-line rigs such as the Jupiter? I'm
> not talking about bells & whistles or even what is expected in a rig
> these days such as multiple VFOs, general coverage, auto notch etc.
> Just a rig that is user friendly, has a clean signal, can dig out the
> weak ones and is low noise and easy on the ears.
>
> Any thoughts?
> --
> Steve Weber
>
>
> No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However
> a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
>
> *******************************
>
> Hey spammers - Harvesting email addresses? Don't overlook these guys!
>
> FCC Chairman Michael K. Powell: mpowell@fcc.gov
> FCC Commissioner Kathleen Q. Abernathy: kabernat@fcc.gov
> FCC Commissioner Michael J. Copps: mcopps@fcc.gov
> FCC Commissioner Kevin J. Martin: kjmweb@fcc.gov
> FCC Commissioner Jonathan S. Adelstein: jadelste@fcc.gov
>
> US Postal Service: customer@email.usps.gov
> Fraud Watch: fraudinfo@psinet.com
> Federal Trade Commission: consumerline@ftc.gov
> Federal Trade Commission: uce@ftc.gov
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|