Hi Pete --
If you experienced this kind of racket, why not file an interference report?
A systematic effort to identify skywave interference from BPL systems could
be helpful. We know where some of these trial
systems are located, and what they generally sound like. So let's see if we
can hear them... and report it when we do.
At one point ARRL had an "ARRL Monitoring Service" that would receive
reports such as intruder reports, help gather a complete
set of data, and then report the problem to the FCC Enforcement Bureau,
Spectrum Enforcement Division. I just did a search on the
ARRL web site for information about this service and couldn't find anything.
A search of the FCC website failed to uncover an electronic way of
submitting interference reports. Written reports may be sent
to:
Federal Communications Commission
Enforcement Bureau
Spectrum Enforcement Division
445 12th Street, SW
Washington, DC 20554
There is an email address fccham@fcc.gov and a phone number (717) 338-2502, but
that seems oriented towards interference reports
between amateur stations. However, a phone call might be worthwhile to verify
what to submit, how, and to whom.
A report should contain information such as the following:
Particulars Concerning the Station Causing the Interference:
A. Name or call sign.
B. Frequency measured
C. Class of emission
D. Bandwidth
E. Field strength
F. Nature of interference
Particulars Concerning the Transmitting Station Interfered with:
G. Name or call sign and category of station
H. Frequency assigned
I. Frequency measured
J. Class of emission
K. Bandwidth
L. Field strength
Particulars Furnished by the Receiving Station Experiencing the Interference:
M. Name of station
N. Geographic location of station; telephone and email contact information.
O. Dates and times of occurrence of harmful interference
Other particulars
Recordings of interference are encouraged and should be submitted on a
standard cassette.
-- Eric K3NA
-----Original Message-----
From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com]On Behalf Of ac5e@comcast.net
Sent: 2004 May 4 12:32
To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] ARRL's BPL NPRM response is out
Well, I found some very wide range digital racket from around 14.3 up to above
18.1 - beam heading 30 degrees east of north - while
listening for CW DX on the 17m band. This stuff had a good bit of QSB but when
it was peaking at S5 it sounded very much like the
BPL audio clips. So I am pretty sure skywave propagation of BPL is already
happening.
Another point that does not get the attention it should - probably because it's
going to be hard to quantify - is interference to
BPL from "intentional radiators" such as licensed Amateur and commercial
services. I get complaints of TVI when my local power
company's service trucks are working in my neighborhood - and when the police
or fire department use their two ways within a block
or two - and I do not see how the very cheap BPL modems are going to keep from
blocking from any moderately strong signal in the
HF-VHF range.
Even IF the utilities are willing to keep our frequencies clear that will solve
nothing if we cannot transmit without blocking our
neighbors internet connections. I already know what happened when a CB'er's
illegal amp blocked a satellite dish's reception.
Semiconductors ARE diodes, and diodes rectify. Whiteout! Followed by a shootout.
I don't want to have to answer my door wearing an armored vest with a shotgun
in my hand - or call the county sheriff whenever a
stranger arrives in my driveway. And that's exactly what will happen if the
Jukes down the road think anything I own or operate
might interfere with viewing the notorious Paris Hilton tape.
73 Pete Allen AC5E
--
Never squat with your spurs on
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|