To: | tentec@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] ARRL's BPL NPRM response is out |
From: | K4IA@aol.com |
Reply-to: | tentec@contesting.com |
Date: | Tue, 4 May 2004 09:00:56 EDT |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
I do not understand why the ARRL did not address the issue of propagated BPL interference. Abatement and remediation are impossible if the unidentified signal is coming from "who knows where?" Why does ARRL and the FCC keep focusing on local interference? My town probably won't ever have BPL but I sure as heck will be able to hear it from other areas. Radio k4ia "Buck" Fredericksburg, Virginia USA _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [Fwd: Re: [TenTec] Re: Ten-Tec], k1swr |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Come see us at Dayton, Ten-Tec Inc. Amateur Radio Sales |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] ARRL's BPL NPRM response is out, Ken Brown |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] ARRL's BPL NPRM response is out, Jim Brown |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |