TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [spam] Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [spam] Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK
From: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Reply-to: tentec@contesting.com
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 14:06:25 -0000
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Tom

You have me confused now for sure!

When you say you "can work around" the QSK switching issue, does that mean
by not bothering with QSK or do you have a cunning work around that hasn't
occurred to me?

I have just run my Orion at 70 wpm for half an hour and I don't hear
anything wrong with the code sent.  Incidentally, I did not use the internal
keyer.

Bob, 5B4AGN

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
To: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 11:02 AM
Subject: Re: [spam] Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK


> I don't have an issue with the QSK switching, one can work around that.
What
> I have an issue with is that most radios I have operated, that employ
> digital techniques, do not send CW correctly at speed over 40 wpm.
> Especially Ten Tec radios.
>
> Tom - W4BQF
>
>
> > I do it differently -- that is, I try to use radios that give me the
> maximum
> > time between dits to listen. And part of what I think W4BQF is
> > complaining about with high speed CW may be that some radios just
> > don't switch fast enough.
> >
> > Jim  K9YC
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TenTec mailing list
> > TenTec@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>