Super!!! Timing is going to be hard to pin down because my son is here and
we are going fishing. Should be able to look for you around 8pm? Sure hope
this works! No words yet from TT on my Plus. Been giving the Orion another
shot for past few days, but it's just not going to work for me.
Anyway, if possible, will see you tomorrow night about 8 pm.
Tom - W4BQF
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 10:03 PM
Subject: TT Re: TT Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK
> Tom:
> Listen for me tomorrow night on 40m if you want to hear an Omni VI+ going
80
> wpm. I found a way to make it work but will still need to make some
> refinements before trying to explain it all. I do need an opinion on the
> keying quality. I should be around 7034.
>
> Steve N4LQ
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
> To: <tentec@contesting.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 9:08 PM
> Subject: Re: TT Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK
>
>
> > Bob,
> >
> > Nope..didn't get it this time either. Don't send it again until I dump
> this
> > McAfee anti-spam on my PC. Sure would like to hear an Orion putting out
> good
> > CW at either 60 or 70 wpm!
> >
> > Tom - W4BQF
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
> > To: <tentec@contesting.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 12:36 PM
> > Subject: TT Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK
> >
> >
> > > Tom
> > >
> > > I have just sent them again. This time with a subject line of "WAV
> > Files."
> > > I suspect the previous one might have fallen victim to your Spam
> defences.
> > > I hope this one gets through.
> > >
> > > 73 Bob, 5B4AGN
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
> > > To: <tentec@contesting.com>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 3:38 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK
> > >
> > >
> > > > Bob....
> > > >
> > > > I did not receive the wav files. Sure would appreciate it if you
> would
> > > send
> > > > them again to aldermant@alltel.net
> > > >
> > > > Thanks.
> > > >
> > > > Tom - W4BQF
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
> > > > To: <tentec@contesting.com>
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 4:21 PM
> > > > Subject: [spam] Re: [spam] Re: [spam] Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Tom
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes I monitored rf output with a seperate receiver. I've sent you
> two
> > > > .wav
> > > > > files of what my Orion produces at 60 wpm.
> > > > >
> > > > > Bob
> > > > >
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
> > > > > To: <tentec@contesting.com>
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 5:07 PM
> > > > > Subject: Re: [spam] Re: [spam] Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > Since you are a very astute ham Bob, I will just assume you did
> that
> > > > while
> > > > > > listening to your Orion on a different receiver. The Orion's
> > sidetone
> > > > > works
> > > > > > OK at 70 wpm, but the two Orions I have certainly will not send
> > > > correctly
> > > > > > timed/spaced CW over about 50 wpm. No one that I have sent CW
at
> > > speeds
> > > > > > over 50 wpm can copy it because the timing is so messed up. And
it
> > is
> > > > not
> > > > > my
> > > > > > PC or DGM keyboard since I have asked two fellow hams to try
> their
> > > > > Orions
> > > > > > at 50 and 60 wpm, with the same results.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I agree, I don't know anyone, except a few German hams, who send
> at
> > 70
> > > > wpm
> > > > > > with a keyer.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Tom - W4BQF
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > From: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
> > > > > > To: <tentec@contesting.com>
> > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 10:06 AM
> > > > > > Subject: [spam] Re: [spam] Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Tom
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You have me confused now for sure!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > When you say you "can work around" the QSK switching issue,
does
> > > that
> > > > > mean
> > > > > > > by not bothering with QSK or do you have a cunning work around
> > that
> > > > > hasn't
> > > > > > > occurred to me?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I have just run my Orion at 70 wpm for half an hour and I
don't
> > hear
> > > > > > > anything wrong with the code sent. Incidentally, I did not
use
> > the
> > > > > > internal
> > > > > > > keyer.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Bob, 5B4AGN
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > > From: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
> > > > > > > To: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>;
> > <tentec@contesting.com>
> > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 11:02 AM
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: [spam] Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I don't have an issue with the QSK switching, one can work
> > around
> > > > > that.
> > > > > > > What
> > > > > > > > I have an issue with is that most radios I have operated,
that
> > > > employ
> > > > > > > > digital techniques, do not send CW correctly at speed over
40
> > wpm.
> > > > > > > > Especially Ten Tec radios.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Tom - W4BQF
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I do it differently -- that is, I try to use radios that
> give
> > me
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > maximum
> > > > > > > > > time between dits to listen. And part of what I think
W4BQF
> is
> > > > > > > > > complaining about with high speed CW may be that some
radios
> > > just
> > > > > > > > > don't switch fast enough.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Jim K9YC
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > TenTec mailing list
> > > > > > > > > TenTec@contesting.com
> > > > > > > > > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > TenTec mailing list
> > > > > > > > TenTec@contesting.com
> > > > > > > > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > TenTec mailing list
> > > > > > > TenTec@contesting.com
> > > > > > > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> > > > > >
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > TenTec mailing list
> > > > > > TenTec@contesting.com
> > > > > > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > TenTec mailing list
> > > > > TenTec@contesting.com
> > > > > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > TenTec mailing list
> > > > TenTec@contesting.com
> > > > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > TenTec mailing list
> > > TenTec@contesting.com
> > > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TenTec mailing list
> > TenTec@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|