To: | <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Re: [Ten-Tec] Alas, not for me - more |
From: | "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy> |
Reply-to: | tentec@contesting.com |
Date: | Thu, 2 Sep 2004 21:56:56 -0000 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
On the other hand Ken you are right. Introducing filters ahead of the A to D convertor will not improve A-D convertor dynamic range. The dynamic range of the A to D convertor will stay exactly as it was. What will be improved is the dynamic range of the system.....and that's what we're interested in......the dynamic range of the receiver not its A to D convertor. Bob, 5B4AGN _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Re: [Ten-Tec] Alas, not for me, Bob Henderson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [TenTec] Returning to Original Call, Jim Reid |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Re: [Ten-Tec] Alas, not for me, Bob Henderson |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Re: [Ten-Tec] Alas, not for me - more, Ken Brown |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |