To: | "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] ARRL Review of FT9000 |
From: | "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net> |
Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Wed, 6 Jul 2005 19:48:20 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
> I guess I am still a youngster at heart as I prefer a > dedicated control (knob or button/switch) versus menu driven > functions. Well in the ensuing 47 years my views have changed regarding that particular measure of goodness :-) > But then again, I also prefer a radio that does > not require a computer to operate it (no downloading, resets, > reboots etc.) A couple of HQ-170's and an HT-37 will solve those problems :-) I'd say the jury is out on the 9000 regarding any of those issues. Who knows? Grant/NQ5T _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [TenTec] One additional Item I found, Mobile mount model 293, JD & KK McCrary |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Yaesu FT9000 oversights in QST review, k3hx@juno.com |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] ARRL Review of FT9000, James Duffer |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] ARRL Review of FT9000, Tommy-W4BQF |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |