| To: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] ARRL Review of FT9000 |
| From: | Barry Gross <barry.n1eu@gmail.com> |
| Reply-to: | Barry Gross <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>,Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Wed, 6 Jul 2005 02:28:41 +0000 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
On 7/6/05, Al Baker <w5iz@yahoo.com> wrote: > Interesting ARRL review posted to Member's site...will appear in August > QST. Does not appear to be worth 3.5 Orions. > Huh? Does not appear to be worth 1.0 Orions. Immediate headscratchers for me was inability to assign both receivers to same vfo (no diversity reception capability) and limited ssb rx audio bandwith, although perhaps tweaking the controls would improve that. Yawn. 73, Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
| Previous by Date: | [TenTec] Orion reflector, Jim McDonald |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Orion reflector, Steve Baron - KB3MM |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] ARRL Review of FT9000, John L Merrill |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] ARRL Review of FT9000, Grant Youngman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |