TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Net

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Net
From: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 21:45:29 -1000
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Hi Perry,

Great Information! Yes I checked out my Paragon II manual, and sure enough there is a control line which causes RX input RF to bypass the first amplifier stage only when in 0.100 - 1.7 MHz. Looks like I could just disconnect one cable for a quich test of this. It is connector 16 on the first mixer schematic.

Thanks for the info.

73 DE N6KB

w8au@sssnet.com wrote:

At 04:07 AM 7/18/05, you wrote:
When KPH was on the air last week, I was able to hear them on 426 kHz with the Paragon II, but I was not too impressed with the performance. Using my 160 meter (1/4 wavelength) inverted L, I expected the 426 kHz signal to be much stronger that it was. I suspect the Paragon's sensitivity at 426 kHz is not too hot, and it is probably no better at 100 kHz.
Not sure about the Para II but the original Para will have more sensitivity on MF if you remove a jumper (#51?) from logic board to the rf amp. It stops the logic from putting in the attenuator on the BC band and lower. (this probably done to avoid IMD if you live next to a BC station) Sensivity much improved. Check your manual to see if you have the same setup on the Para II.

Perry w8au
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>