TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Station / C-21

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Station / C-21
From: w8au@sssnet.com
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 20:18:24 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
At 04:30 PM 11/6/05, Mike Bryce wrote:
you got to be kidding...

Nope

 a century 21 for a new ham..  that direct
conversion scheme will make a quick migraine for any new ham on the cw
bands...

As a beginner I spent 3 years with a Hallicrafters S-19R, wide as a barn and full of images... learned a lot about MENTAL selectivity at that time, which is a valuable asset to have. :-) The direct conversion RX is much cleaner (with no +910 kHz images) and the RIT allows listening to the other side of zero beat to evade some QRM. I would have been "in heaven" as a young ham if I had had a C-21.

Not mentioned previously was "maintenance." The C-21 is so simple... minimum alignment, small parts count, less to go wrong....

Currently, I have a C-21 parked on 3577 for the nightly Buckeye TFC net.
(so I put my money where my mouth is...) :-)
My Corsair II and Paragon are for general ham and MARS work.

You know the syndrome here.... a separate rig for each freq and mode!  :-)

would be much better off with a triton 4 or argosy or even a omni a, b,
or c

Cost was a factor, he said.......

Perry



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>