TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Orion 2.055 Observations

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Orion 2.055 Observations
From: "Mark Erbaugh" <mark@microenh.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 09:53:55 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Maybe I'm wrong, but can I assume that the narrower filters have a greater minimum length? If so, my observations have a strange quirk. I don't remember the exact numbers, but as I was reducing the bandwith from say, 1000 Hz, at 280 Hz, the filtering went wide open. However, when I continued down to 270 Hz, the filtering was restored. Then at 200 no filtering, 190 filtering, etc.

----- Original Message ----- From: "Sinisa Hristov" <shristov@ptt.yu>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 1:54 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Orion 2.055 Observations


Mark Erbaugh wrote:

If you set the number of taps for the DSP filters to 32 (minimum), the filter doesn't track bandwidth changes very well. As you decrease the bandwidth (in 10 Hz steps), you will find a step where there is essentially no filtering (i.e. it opens wide). This is repeatable.


This is normal.
There is a theoretical minimum filter length for a given bandwidth.


73,

Sinisa  YT1NT, VE3EA
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec



--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.1.1/273 - Release Date: 3/2/2006




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>