TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] (no subject)

To: "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] (no subject)
From: "Larry Menzel" <retire@means.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 10:00:48 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Com'on, Grant...a "bit worse"...that's pretty harsh.

How about "slightly less" or "not quite as good" or "only minutely lower".


It's still head and shoulders over the nearest modern competitor.  Let's
rejoice in the major victory.

Larry, N0XB  ;-)




-----Original Message-----
From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com]
On Behalf Of Grant Youngman
Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 9:43 AM
To: 'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'
Subject: Re: [TenTec] (no subject)

 
> Bob has added the Orion II data to the dynamic range table on 
> his site as well other rigs and some corrections.

Interesting that BDR, LO Phase Noise and and MDS are a bit worse than the v1
Orion.  Could be just his sample (?).  But perhaps not.

Grant/NQ5T 


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.1.384 / Virus Database: 268.4.2/314 - Release Date: 4/16/2006
 

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>