TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] LOTW

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] LOTW
From: KC1DI <davekc1di@gmail.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 06:20:57 -0400
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Many more would up load to L.O.T.W. if were much less cumbersome a
process. They should have taken Eqsl up on their offer years ago..
E-qsl has a fine system and it works very well. There are more award
committee's excepting their qsls every day .

KC1DI


On 3/15/07, stoskopf@tri.net <stoskopf@tri.net> wrote:
> A great addition would be for the major contests to submit their logs to
> LOTW.  The checkers could eliminate any 'uniques'.  Most of us work DXCC
> in some category each contest and never get nearly that many hits even a
> year later.
>
> N0UU
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>