TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Omni VII - I feel like such a n00b...

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Omni VII - I feel like such a n00b...
From: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 16:41:39 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Oh heck !

Don't feel badly though.....we've all done much dumber things than this !

I'm happy that the zeros are not going to be an issue after all.

73 de Gary, AA2IZ


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jeff Iddings" <jeff@iddings.us>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2007 6:24 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Omni VII - I feel like such a n00b...


> I'm a dumb dumb...  I was trying to set the IP address via holding down
> the RIT button and turning on the radio...
>
> I didn't realize I could also set the IP when the radio was in 'remote
> state' via the menu. When I do this, I am able to turn to 192.168.0.3.
>
> Sorry for being an idiot.
>
> By the way, the remote state is nifty - I haven't transmitted yet, but
> the rx audio sounds very good (while on my home network, anyway).
>
> Jeff
>
> Jeff Iddings wrote:
> > :)
> >
> > Honestly, as I'm not terrible interested in the remote capabilities, I'm
> > more than willing to make an inquiry to TenTec on Monday. No hurry, by
> > no means.. if it's never resolved, so be it.
> >
> > I'm using the latest firmware/boot loader, I re-flashed, just for the
> > fun of it.. same situation. As soon as I can find my 512mb CF flash
> > card, I'm going to make a video so someone can tell me what I might be
> > doing wrong..
> >
> > As for trivial or not, if I had built things 5 years ago with the
> > intention of having a more dynamic network, changing from .0.x to .1.x
> > would be absolutely trivial.. but there's countless changes I'd have to
> > make including bind IP configs in lots of daemons, /etc/hosts on each
> > box, and the like..
> >
> > But anyhow, I'm VERY pleased with the radio, and I thin I initially
> > outlined this problem as being minor. It's not really worth further
> > discussion unless perhaps someone has encountered the same problem.
> >
> > Thanks again!
> >
> > Jeff - W4GPL
> >
> > Gary Hoffman wrote:
> >> Well Jeff, I'm not trolling for a dispute  :)
> >>
> >> I agree that it would be better otherwise.  I note that some posters
say
> >> that it is in fact different...so we have some question even about the
> >> facts, or if all versions of the radio are the same.
> >>
> >> Ten Tec....you listening ?  Care to straighten out the facts ?
> >>
> >> In any case I said it was trivial because DHCP served devices (like
most
> >> PC's) will get themselves a new address just by being power cycled.
And
> >> then, changing a fixed IP address on a computer is only a few mouse
clicks,
> >> as you already know.
> >>
> >> Perhaps "trivial" was too strong a term, but a few mouse clicks cannot
at
> >> least be called difficult.
> >>
> >> I have some 35 users on my system, most of them wireless, located up to
a
> >> mile away.  We have outdoor antennas and amplifiers.  We change address
> >> blocks pretty much weekly, as one of several security measures and to
help
> >> keep people from pirating our bandwidth.
> >>
> >> As you said, a matter of perspective.
> >>
> >> 73 de Gary, AA2IZ
> >>
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message ----- 
> >> From: "Jeff Iddings" <jeff@iddings.us>
> >> To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
> >> Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2007 8:45 PM
> >> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Omni VII - I feel like such a n00b...
> >>
> >>
> >>> Gary Hoffman wrote:
> >>>> Reconfiguring the local non-routable address block used from
> >> 192.168.0.xxx
> >>>> to 192.168.1.xxx is a trivial task, as you know.  I often change mine
> >> for a
> >>>> variety of reasons.
> >>>>
> >>> Trivial for who? With all due respect, I have no less than 12 devices
> >>> already on my 'home' network. Two other geeky roommates equals a lot
of
> >>> network devices.
> >>>
> >>> It would be trivial for TenTec to fix this bug. All a matter of
> >>> perspective.
> >>>
> >>> Jeff
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> TenTec mailing list
> >>> TenTec@contesting.com
> >>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> TenTec mailing list
> >> TenTec@contesting.com
> >> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TenTec mailing list
> > TenTec@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
>


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>