To: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [TenTec] Faraday cage |
From: | Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net> |
Reply-to: | ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Sat, 04 Apr 2009 10:20:29 -1000 |
List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
>> >> The ideal is a Faraday Cage - enclosing your shack in a (nearly) solid >> conducting box. >> The only way a Faraday cage around your shack could save your radio equipment from the effects of RF would be if every single cable had perfectly balanced RF currents so that no cable inside the shack Faraday cage radiated any RF, and every piece of equipment (except perhaps the one you are trying to protect from RF by shielding and bypassing everything else instead of this one piece of equipment) would have to have proper shielding and RF bypassing of all leads that entered/exited each piece of equipment. If you could not accomplish all of that, the Faraday cage would do nothing for you. The Faraday cage could even have the effect of increasing the RF problems by virtue of standing wave resonances making hot spots in some places at some frequencies. Much less effort and expense to properly shield and bypass the piece of equipment that has the problem. DE N6KB _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] RF Ground, Steve Hunt |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] 262G power supply - no rest for the weary, Mike Hyder -N4NT- |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] RF Ground, Jim Brown |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Faraday cage, Gary Hoffman |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |