TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Faraday cage

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Faraday cage
From: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 00:32:30 -0400
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Well yes they did.

But I think the point made by the other poster was that noise can be 
generated inside the faraday cage, by the problematic wiring he mentioned, 
rendering the cage useless.

That in fact was the problem we ultimately had.  And corrected.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Stuart Rohre" <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 05, 2009 12:35 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Faraday cage


> They had something not right in that Faraday cage, if you had noise
> inside.  Of course, copper does not adequately block low frequency
> magnetic field components, and that likely was the source of your
> noise.  Our ACE rooms at Southwest Research were doubled steel panels..
> Same for the anechoic chambers at Dell Computers in Austin.  They have a
> 30m room that is also lined with anechoic foam as well as being solid
> walls of metal.  It even has an air tight remote controlled
> pneumatically powered door.  It is acoustically and RF quiet!
>
> 73,
> Stuart Rohre
> K5KVH, Austin TX
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> 


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>