TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [TenTec] Why no mention of TT?

from [Dalton McCrary] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Why no mention of TT?
From: Dalton McCrary <jdkkm@bellsouth.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 11:01:41 -0800 (PST)
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> 
That is a very good question.  I saw that yesterday and wondered the same thing.

73,
Dalton - W4WUQ




________________________________
From: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Wed, November 16, 2011 12:41:21 PM
Subject: [TenTec] Why no mention of TT?

Subject says it all!

http://www.edn.com/article/519742-Ham_radio_in_the_21st_century.php

Steve G3TXQ
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  [TenTec] Why no mention of TT?, Steve Hunt
Next by Date:  Re: [TenTec] Orion's break in, Richards
Previous by Thread:  [TenTec] Why no mention of TT?, Steve Hunt
Next by Thread:  Re: [TenTec] Why no mention of TT?, Fabrizio iz2kxc
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]