TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Why no mention of TT?

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Why no mention of TT?
From: "Fabrizio iz2kxc" <iz2kxc@tiscali.it>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 21:06:35 +0100
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Maybe they haven't paid for advertising,
Don't you?

73
Fabrizio
IZ2KXC
N2DN
iz2kxc@tiscali.it
iz2kxc@arrl.net
iz2kxc@wia.org.au
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dalton McCrary" <jdkkm@bellsouth.net>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2011 8:01 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Why no mention of TT?


That is a very good question. I saw that yesterday and wondered the same 
thing.

73,
Dalton - W4WUQ




________________________________
From: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Wed, November 16, 2011 12:41:21 PM
Subject: [TenTec] Why no mention of TT?

Subject says it all!

http://www.edn.com/article/519742-Ham_radio_in_the_21st_century.php

Steve G3TXQ
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec 

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>