TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Re. [Ten Tec] --- and balanced fed verticals

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Re. [Ten Tec] --- and balanced fed verticals
From: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: k9yc@arrl.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:08:30 -0800
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
On 1/26/2012 12:36 PM, Stuart Rohre wrote:
I agree with you, but the original post defined a possibly balanced or
near balanced vertical system, a quarter wave antenna with at least two
radials.  (This was the classic RCA design by Brown et al, when the
ground plane antenna as it came to be called was invented.)  (Later the
marketing department wanted and added more radials
"to look more symmetrical".)

But this antenna is NOT balanced -- the radials have a MUCH MUCH LOWER impedance to earth than the vertical element. It is a GOOD antenna, but it is NOT a BALANCED antenna.

73, Jim Brown K9YC

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>